FeedPosted Nov 3rd 2009 10:20AM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Scandals, Mutual funds, Headline news
Investors are calling for an inquiry into mutual fund fees, but the Supreme Court is reminding them that it isn't beholden to public opinion. The mutual fund industry is being accused of charging "excessive" fees, which could be particularly harsh on individual investors who use these tools as their primary way to access the market. Currently, the mutual fund industry has more than $10 trillion in assets under management, some of it through retirement and 529 college savings plans.
The Court doesn't seem inclined to step into the fray, saying that regulatory agencies are better equipped to address the situation. Chief Justice John Roberts, for example, said during arguments that "It makes a lot more sense to have the SEC regulate rates than to have courts do it, doesn't it?"
Continue reading Supreme Court pushes back on mutual fund issue
Posted Oct 26th 2009 4:15PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Rumors, Scandals
A very interesting piece of news passed the wire late Friday, October 23. Smart Choices, which is a million-dollar food labeling program, was voluntarily halted on Friday thanks to a bit of mislabeling.
Earlier in the week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced that it was looking into Smart Choices' labeling practices. The FDA feels that Smart Choices (although the company wasn't named as a specific target by the government) may use misleading labels on some of the products it has deemed nutritionally sound.
Continue reading Smart Choices halts its labeling program
Posted Oct 21st 2009 4:40PM by Tom Johansmeyer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Scandals
All it takes is a little patience. F. Scott Yeager, a former Enron executive, got some good news from the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, which ruled that it wouldn't revisit his case. So, he no longer has criminal charges related to financial fraud hanging over him. Yeager has been acquitted on all counts. This follows a June ruling by the Supreme Court, which tossed a previous 5th Circuit Court ruling that could have resulted in a new trial.
The ruling said, "Today, ... it is clear under our initial ... analysis the jury made a finding in acquitting Yeager that precludes prosecution on insider trading and money laundering." Samuel Buffone, who was one of Yeager's attorneys, stated that his client shouldn't have been indicted to begin with and didn't do anything wrong. It has taken them seven years to get to this point.
Yeager landed in hot water because he sold stock in Enron for more than $54 million before it began the plunge that would ultimately end with its bankruptcy in 2001. He faced 125 counts, was acquitted of five (four for wire fraud and one for conspiracy to commit wire and securities fraud) and wound up with a hung jury for the remaining 120, which included insider trading and money laundering. He was later indicted again on 13 counts of insider trading and money laundering.
Continue reading Former Enron exec set free
Posted Oct 21st 2009 1:10PM by Mark Fightmaster (RSS feed)
Filed under: Rumors, Law, Scandals
On Wednesday, Galleon Group founder Raj Rajaratnam told employees via letter that the company is going to wind down all of its hedge funds. In a Wall Street Journal article (subscription required), a person familiar with Galleon said that one of the alternatives the company is exploring is selling out to another firm.
These alternatives were approached by Rajaratnam in his letter, as he told employees that it is "in the best interest of our investors and employees to conduct an orderly wind down of Galleon's funds while we explore various alternatives for our business."
Continue reading Galleon to shutter its hedge funds, is anyone surprised?
Posted Oct 20th 2009 10:00AM by Jim Cramer (RSS feed)
Filed under: Google (GOOG), Intel (INTC), Market matters, Scandals, Sun Microsystems (JAVA), Akamai Technologies (AKAM), Cramer on BloggingStocks
The Street.com's Jim Cramer says that it's awful knowing that Galleon had every single nuance of the next Intel call. The call. The edge. The inside scoop. At one point, you could have it. At one point, before Regulation Fair Disclosure (FD), persistence, hard work, going to meetings, doing everything you could to learn a company entitled you to a callback from the company. The rules were clear: If you got something that was material and non-public, you couldn't trade on it, you were frozen. But there were some blurred lines and the intensive research shops with great industry contacts could get an ever-so-slight heads up that could make a difference. Or you could go to a one-on-one where management might let slip something no one had, and you could have that momentary head start.
But Regulation FD ended all that. All the insider calls, the disclosure at one-on-ones, anything that smacked even of proprietary information. The rules were no longer voluntary. It wasn't a question of freezing. It was a question of talking. You couldn't talk to "them." Hedge funds could not talk one-on-one to anyone of authority at a company. The insider would face prosecution, do you weren't even supposed to try.
Continue reading Cramer on BloggingStocks: A mockery of the game
Posted Oct 14th 2009 5:20PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Law, Scandals

Two New York investors have filed a lawsuit against the Securities & Exchange Commission, accusing the SEC of a "pattern of incompetence" in failing to detect and put a stop to Bernie Madoff's Ponzi Scheme.
"Had the SEC carried out its functions with even a minimum of reasonable due care, many, if not most, of Madoff's victims would have been spared the financial ruin they face today,"
the complaint said.
Continue reading Madoff victims sue SEC: silly
Posted Oct 13th 2009 5:30PM by Zac Bissonnette (RSS feed)
Filed under: Scandals
USA Today's Matt Krantz reports that shares of some companies bankrupted by the financial crisis have posted huge gains in recent months: "Lehman and WaMu, for instance, were booted from stock exchanges and filed for bankruptcy protection. Yet on the lightly regulated Pink Sheets markets, this year their stocks are up 500% and 1,050%, respectively."
The problem is that shares of companies like Lehman and WaMu are completely worthless with no prospect for recovery for shareholders. Ownership of the company's assets is no longer held by the common stock -- and with creditors taking losses, there is no chance that shareholders will receive a nickel.
Continue reading Memo to SEC: Put the zombie stocks out of their misery
Next Page »